Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

Interpolation doesn't work with nodes without address #5309

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 9 comments
Closed

Interpolation doesn't work with nodes without address #5309

openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 9 comments

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: niqueco
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 3.23pm, Friday, 17th April 2015]

"gorriti 3639" works, because there's a node there. However "gorriti 3638" doesn't.

I can't find any interpolated result that would work around here.

Not being able to handle interpolations renders nominatim useless.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: lonvia
[Added to the original trac issue at 9.01pm, Friday, 17th April 2015]

Nominatim is quite able to handle interpolations. If one doesn't work for you, it would be extremely helpful if you could mention the city and country you are talking about for a start. You should also supply links to the map and/or to example interpolation ways that don't work.

Closing because of insufficient information.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: niqueco
[Added to the original trac issue at 9.05pm, Friday, 17th April 2015]

Have you at least tried the input I mentioned before closing the issue?

Here: [http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search.php?q=gorriti+3638&viewbox=-141.33%2C58.13%2C141.33%2C-58.13]

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: niqueco
[Added to the original trac issue at 9.12pm, Friday, 17th April 2015]

I see the interpolation is connected to the street with a relation. Maybe nominatim doesn't support that.

(Still amazed by the "works for me" =) )

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: datendelphin
[Added to the original trac issue at 12.41pm, Saturday, 18th April 2015]

I'm with lonvia here, it is unclear where this Gorriti street is and which interpolation you think is not recognized by nominatim. please provide a link like: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302821410
Is this the interpolation you mean?

Don't take the "works for me" too literally. This is only a status of the ticket. Lonvia explained that you need to provide more information for this ticket to make sense.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: lonvia
[Added to the original trac issue at 1.10pm, Saturday, 18th April 2015]

So we are talking about Buenos Aires. Thanks for investigating, datendelphin.

If you mean the interpolation http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198380022, it looks like this restaurant http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2086715079 is confusing Nominatim because it does not have a housenumber.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: lonvia
[Added to the original trac issue at 4.59pm, Saturday, 18th April 2015]

Fixed in [changeset:b82c8ce/nominatim].

I've manually invalidated the interpolation above. For example, [http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search.php?q=gorriti+3637%2C+palermo Gottiti 3637, Palermo] works now. Please be aware that the database has not been reindexed. All other interpolations will be gradually updated as the data is changed in OSM.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: niqueco
[Added to the original trac issue at 5.15pm, Saturday, 18th April 2015]

Thanks! Sorry if my first message looked too harsh, it wasn't my intention. Thanks for this great software! =)

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: niqueco
[Added to the original trac issue at 5.21pm, Saturday, 18th April 2015]

Uhm.. Gorriti 3638 doesn't seem to work. The interpolation way is: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198380023

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: lonvia
[Added to the original trac issue at 5.37pm, Saturday, 18th April 2015]

The interpolations in the database need to be recomputed before the addresses can actually be found. It is not possible for performance reasons to immediately find and fix all of them. You will have to wait that the data gets gradually updated, I'm afraid.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant