You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: simpsonpaulcolin[at]gmail.com [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 3.08pm, Wednesday, 16th December 2015]
At Node: 177731407 there is a Turn Right restriction going from residential road Fourth Avenue onto teritiary road Dagenham Road. When inputting the From: To: details of the turn restriction the To: section will not highlight Dagenham Road as an option. Instead it will provide Fourth Avenue as an option which is in fact the road the restriction is From. For now I have left the To: field blank.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: simpsonpaulcolin[at]gmail.com [Added to the original trac issue at 9.55am, Wednesday, 23rd December 2015]
Should I really need to do that? Everything is meeting the spec- Fourth Avenue and Dagenham Road are correctly joined and attributed- I am just not getting Dagenham Road as a road to select in the 'To' field.
Author: simpsonpaulcolin[at]gmail.com [Added to the original trac issue at 10.16am, Wednesday, 23rd December 2015]
OK....I split the node at the junction and indeed....it did work. Many thanks for the tip. Would be nice to have Potlatch working where you don't have this.
Reporter: simpsonpaulcolin[at]gmail.com
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 3.08pm, Wednesday, 16th December 2015]
At Node: 177731407 there is a Turn Right restriction going from residential road Fourth Avenue onto teritiary road Dagenham Road. When inputting the From: To: details of the turn restriction the To: section will not highlight Dagenham Road as an option. Instead it will provide Fourth Avenue as an option which is in fact the road the restriction is From. For now I have left the To: field blank.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: