Opened 15 years ago

Closed 12 years ago

#57 closed enhancement (wontfix)

wfs-t: evaluate the usefulness of supporting this standard.

Reported by: mikel_maron@… Owned by: mikel_maron@…
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: api Version:
Keywords: Cc:


there is some work going on in extending it for versioning, attribution. chris holmes is contact.

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by mikel_maron@…

Owner: changed from steve@… to mikel_maron@…

comment:2 Changed 15 years ago by mikel_maron@…

Type: defectenhancement

comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by crschmidt

Resolution: wontfix
Status: newclosed

WFS-T and OSM are really not closely enough related. The big thing is that WFS-T is all based on 'simple features', typically based on GML, rather than a topological format like OSM. There is no simple solution to this, and I'm not aware of anyway to use WFS-T that would get around this particular problem.

Chris's work in WFS-T is great, but really not something OSM can seriously take advantage of.

I'm going to close this: having sat untouched for 2.5 years has allowed the tech to develop, and proved that this integration simply isn't the right path.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.