Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

Lauri Hahne's suggestions #712

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Lauri Hahne's suggestions #712

openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: Richard
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 10.28am, Wednesday, 27th February 2008]

There are few quirks currently with Potlatch. I hope somebody could fix these :D

  1. The auto complete is great but its behaviour is a bit non-standard.
    Currently only enter chooses the currently highlighted item and jumps
    to the next box. Usually tab does this too, and it must be dozens of
    times I've hit tab and then had to return to complete the tag name.

  2. The show gps tracks button looks like eraser. I think it's supposed
    to look like a gps receiver. This would need a better button, maybe a
    few dotted lines crossing or so.

  3. There should be a way to remove a key-value pair without clearing
    the fields. E.g. there could be a small minus sign next to a pair to
    remove that pair.

  4. There should be a way to show all possible options in the preset
    type menu (the button with image left to the actual presets). This
    could be done, for example, by showing all the possibilities if the
    user clicks and holds it.

  5. I don't know how easy this would be but I'd like to see Nasa's
    Landsat images besides OpenAerial's as Nasa's seem to have better
    colours around here.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: erik[at]tiq.com
[Added to the original trac issue at 11.29pm, Friday, 16th May 2008]

#3 is fixed the rest have been split up to:

Replaced with:

http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/909
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/908
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/907
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/906

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: erik[at]tiq.com
[Added to the original trac issue at 11.30pm, Friday, 16th May 2008]

This looks much better: :-)

#906
#907
#908
#909

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant